DN600 Dam Needle Regulating Valve

Project Background

This report presents the findings from the inspection and assessment of a DN600 Needle Regulating Valve received from a water authority for inspection, report, and potential repair. The valve was originally manufactured according to John Valves arrangement drawing AH857 in 1984. The inspection aimed to evaluate the valve’s overall condition, assess component integrity, and determine the feasibility of refurbishment versus replacement.

The inspection focused on identifying operational failures, structural deficiencies, and wear-related issues. Major concerns included corrosion, component modifications, and non-functionality of key mechanical elements. The following sections detail findings and recommended rectifications to restore operational integrity.

Scope of Work

The inspection process included:

  1. Preliminary Visual Inspection – Evaluation of the external condition of the valve.
  2. Cleaning and Polishing – Removal of scale and deposits from critical sealing faces to assess corrosion levels.
  3. Detailed Internal Inspection – Dismantling and thorough examination of internal components.
  4. Dimensional Analysis – Comparison of key components against OEM specifications to identify modifications or wear.
  5. Repair and Replacement Recommendations – Recommendations based on inspection findings to restore operational reliability.

This outlines the key steps taken during the inspection. The process involved a systematic evaluation of external and internal components, ensuring that deviations from original specifications were accurately identified and assessed for repair feasibility.

Inspection & Procedure

The inspection process included:

  1. Preliminary Visual Inspection – Evaluation of the external condition of the valve.
  2. Cleaning and Polishing – Removal of scale and deposits from critical sealing faces to assess corrosion levels.
  3. Detailed Internal Inspection – Dismantling and thorough examination of internal components.
  4. Dimensional Analysis – Comparison of key components against OEM specifications to identify modifications or wear.
  5. Repair and Replacement Recommendations – Recommendations based on inspection findings to restore operational reliability.

This section outlines the key steps taken during the inspection. The process involved a systematic evaluation of external and internal components, ensuring that deviations from original specifications were accurately identified and assessed for repair feasibility.

Inspection Methodology

Our structured approach to the inspection included:

  1. Preliminary Visual Assessment – External review of the valve’s condition upon receipt.
  2. Disassembly and Internal Examination – Step-by-step dismantling to access internal components and evaluate damage.
  3. Cleaning and Surface Preparation – Removal of contaminants to expose wear, corrosion, and structural integrity issues.
  4. Dimensional Verification – Measurement of critical components against OEM specifications.
  5. Analysis and Findings – Identification of key issues affecting the valve’s functionality and recommendations for corrective action.

The methodology ensured a thorough assessment of the valve, using visual inspection, dimensional analysis, and cleaning to uncover damage. This approach allowed for an informed assessment of wear, corrosion, and modifications that impacted functionality.

 

Operational Failure and Structural Deficiencies

  • The valve was found inoperable via the Actuator Spindle, preventing movement of the Needle.
  • The standard disassembly process was not feasible due to the non-operational condition of the valve.
  • Inlet Cone removal was necessary, requiring a welded pipe for secure extraction due to the absence of lifting points.
  • The Backing Plate exhibited stripped internal threads, preventing the drive gear from engaging with the stem.
  • Significant corrosion was present on various internal components, affecting sealing performance.

Critical operational failures were identified, including spindle non-functionality and stripped threads. Structural weaknesses, including corrosion and past modifications, have severely affected valve performance.

Operational Failure and Structural Deficiencies

  • The valve was found inoperable via the Actuator Spindle, preventing movement of the Needle.
  • The standard disassembly process was not feasible due to the non-operational condition of the valve.
  • Inlet Cone removal was necessary, requiring a welded pipe for secure extraction due to the absence of lifting points.
  • The Backing Plate exhibited stripped internal threads, preventing the drive gear from engaging with the stem.
  • Significant corrosion was present on various internal components, affecting sealing performance.

Critical operational failures were identified, including spindle non-functionality and stripped threads. Structural weaknesses, including corrosion and past modifications, have severely affected valve performance.

Drive Spindle & Gear Assembly

  • The Drive Spindle diameter and thread details deviated from the OEM specifications.
  • The Drive Gear was non-original and modified, featuring sleeve and scotch key securing.
  • Internal threads were severely worn, affecting engagement and causing operational failure.

Sealing Surface & Body Integrity

  • A modified seat profile was machined onto the Flange sealing face, deviating from OEM specifications.
  • Corrosion and wear were observed in the recess for the Stem Guide within the Body Inlet Sub-Assembly.
  • Minor corrosion was present on the flange connection near the O-ring groove of the Body Outlet Sub-Assembly.

Needle Cone & Guide System

  • Previous weld repairs and buffing marks indicated prior damage and attempts at restoration.
  • Deep markings and indentations on the Needle surface suggested operational wear from debris.
  • The Stem Guide was modified, bored oversize to accommodate a larger spindle.
Conclusion & Recommendation

Each critical component exhibited significant modifications or wear. The drive assembly showed deviations from OEM design, the sealing surfaces were altered, and corrosion was prevalent, affecting the valve’s ability to function effectively.

Recommended Rectification Work

To restore the valve to a serviceable condition, the following actions are proposed:

  1. Abrasive blasting of all ferrous surfaces, followed by application of Jotun Jotamastic 90 protective coating.
  2. Metal filler application to repair corroded sections of the Body Sub-Assemblies.
  3. Manufacture of a new Drive Spindle to align with existing modifications.
  4. Manufacture and installation of a new Actuator Spindle, ensuring proper engagement with the Pinion Gear.
  5. Rectification of the Drive Gear to match the new Drive Spindle and ensure compatibility with internal modifications.
  6. Replacement of bushings, thrust bearings, seals, gaskets, and O-rings.
  7. Machining of the Needle Cone to remove indentations and improve sealing surface integrity.
  8. Manufacture and fitting of a new Backing Plate to accommodate existing modifications.
  9. Polishing of the Cone Assembly and other stainless-steel components.
  10. Final assembly, pressure testing, and external coating touch-up.
  11. Preparation for transport and return to service.

A structured repair plan was developed to address key issues. This plan includes component replacements, surface re-machining, corrosion treatment, and reassembly to restore operational capability.

Analysis and Recommendation

Although repair is technically feasible, several considerations impact the final decision:

  1. Cost vs. Replacement: The cumulative repair cost approaches that of a new valve.
  2. Remaining Service Life: Despite repairs, underlying corrosion and past modifications limit expected longevity.
  3. Performance Reliability: Given the significant prior modifications, achieving a perfect seal remains uncertain.
  4. Operational Functionality: While full isolation capability may not be restored, the valve’s flow control function will be fully operational post-overhaul.

Repair is a viable but imperfect solution. While refurbishment will restore functionality, limitations exist due to prior modifications. Cost-effectiveness and long-term reliability remain factors in decision-making.

 

Outcome

The DN600 Needle Regulating Valve has undergone a comprehensive inspection, revealing significant internal wear, corrosion, and prior modifications. While complete refurbishment is possible, achieving a perfect seal remains uncertain due to past modifications and existing damage. Given its primary function in pressure flow control rather than isolation, an overhaul will restore operational capability, allowing the valve to return to service.

Before:
Before Needle Valve
After:
600mm Dam Regulating Needle Valve